References and Other Print Resources   

Anh, J., Kraley, S., Fogarty, D., Lai, F., &  Deppman, L. (2000). A Study of Washington State 's

     TANF Leavers and TANF Recipients: Welfare Reform and Findings from Administrative

     Data Final Report. Washington State Office of Planning and Research Economic Services

     Administration. [Available online:].

Berrick, J.D. (1999). Entitled to what? Welfare and child welfare policy in a shifting policy environment.

     Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 709-717.

Courtney , M.E. (1998). The costs of child protection in the context of welfare reform. Future of Children,

     8, 88-103.

Courtney , M.E. , Piliavin, I. , Dworsky, A., & Zinn, A. (2002). Involvement of TANF Applicants with Child

     Protective Services: An Update. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work Research Conference.

     San Diego , CA. January 19, 2002 .

Derr, M.K., & Cooley, V. (In press). Does welfare grant sanctioning increase the prevalence of child

     welfare involvement with TANF families? Children and Youth Services Review.

Fein, D., and Lee, W. (2001). The ABC Evaluation: Impacts of Delaware 's Welfare Reform on Child

     Maltreatment. Cambridge , MA : Abt Associates, Inc. [Available on-line:

     reports/welfare-download/malpap-2.pdf ].

Geen, R., Fender, L., & Leos-Urbel, J. (February 2001). Welfare Reform's Effect on Child Welfare

     Caseloads, Discussion Papers, Assessing the New Federalism. Urban Institute. [Available on-line:].

Geen, R., Kortenkamp, K., & Stagner (In press). Foster care experiences of long-term welfare recipients

     in California . Social Services Review.

Gennetian, L. A. and Morris, P. A. (In press). How time limits and make work pay strategies affect the

     well-being of children: Experimental evidence from two welfare reform programs. Children and Youth

     Services Review.

Julnes, G., and Halter, A. (2000). Illinois Study of Former TANF Clients: Final Report. Institute for

     Public Affairs University of Illinois at Springfield in collaboration with School of Social Work

     University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. [Available on-line:


Kamerman, S.B., and Kahn, A.J. (1997). Child welfare in the context of welfare reform (Report V):

     Confronting the new politics of child and family policy in the United States . New York , NY : Columbia

     University School of Social Work.

Kauff, J., Fowler, L., Fraker, T., & Milliner-Waddell, J. (2001). Iowa Families That Left TANF: Why Did

     They Leave and How Are They Faring? Mathematica Policy Research Inc. and Iowa Department of

     Human Services Division of Economic Assistance. [Available online: http://www.mathematicampr.


Kortenkamp, K., Geen, R., & Stagner, M. (In press). The role of welfare and work in predicting foster

     care reunification rates for children of welfare recipients. Children and Youth Services Review.

Maryland Department of Human Resources and University of Maryland School of Social Work . (1998).

     Highlights from Life After Welfare: Second Interim Report. [Available online: http://www.dhr.state.].

Needell, B., Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Brookhart, A., & Lee, S. (1999). Transitions from AFDC to child

     welfare in California . Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 815-841.

Ovwigho, P., C., Leavitt, K. L., & Born, C. E. (In press). Risk factors for child abuse and neglect among

     former TANF families: Do later leavers experience greater risk? Children and Youth Services Review.

Shook, K. (1999). Does the loss of welfare income increase the risk of involvement with the child welfare

     system? Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 781-814.

Tweedie, J., Reichert, D., and O'Conor, M. (1999). Tracking Recipients After They Leave Welfare: Survey

     of Closed Cases - Kansas . National Conference of State Legislatures. [Available online:].

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and

     Evaluation. (2000). Dynamics of Children's Movement among the AFDC, Medicaid and Foster Care

     Programs Prior to Welfare Reform: 1995-1996. Washington D.C. : ASPE. [Available on-line:].

Westra, K.L., and Routley, J. (2000). Arizona Cash Assistance Exit Study: First Quarter 1998 Cohort

     Final Report. Arizona Department of Economic Security Office of Evaluation. [Available online:].




  aberdeen-abz   cork-crk   kansas-city-mci   peru-lima
  akron-cak   czech-prague   kaohsiung-khh   philadelphia-phl
  albuquerque-abq   dallas-dal   kennedy-jfk   philippines-manila
  allentown-abe   dallas-dfw   kent-mse   pittsburgh-pit
  amarillo-ama   dayton-day   knoxville-tys   portland-pwm
  anchorage-anc   denmark-copenhagen   korea-seoul   portland-pdx
  buenosaires   denver-den   la-guardia-lga   portugal-lisbon-lis
  aspen-ase   des-moines-dsm   lansing-lan   providence-pvd
  atlanta-atl   detroit-dtw   las-vegas-las   raleigh-rdu
  atlantic-city-acy   dublin-dub   leeds-lba   reno-rno
  auckland-akl   east-midlands-ema   lincoln-lnk   rochester-roc
  australia-sydney   edinburgh-edi   little-rock-lit   rochester-rst
  austria-vienna   edmonton-yeg   liverpool-lpl   rockford-rfd
  baltimore-bwi   eugene-eug   london-city-lcy   sacramento-smf
  baton-rouge-btr   evansville-evv   london-england   san-diego-san
  beijing-pek   exeter-ext   london-gatwick-lgw   san-francisco-sfo
  belfast-bfs   fairbanks-fai   london-heathrow-lhr   san-jose-sjc
  belfast-bhd   fargo-far   london-luton-ltn   savannah-sav
  belgium-brussels   fayetteville-xna   london-stansted-stn   shanghai-sha
  billings-bil   fort-myers-rsw   long-beach-lgb   shannon-snn
  binghamton-bgm   fort-wayne-fwa   los-angeles-lax   shreveport-shv
  birmingham-bhm   france-paris   louisville-lou   singapore-sin
  birmingham-bhx   fresno-fat-yosemite   macau-mfm   south-america
  bloomington-bmi   ft-lauderdale-fort   malaysia-kualalumpur   southampton-sou
  boise-boi   germany-berlin   manchester-man   south-bend-sbn
  boston-logan-bos   glasgow-gla   manchester-mht   springfield-sgf
  bozeman-bzn   glasgow-prestwick-pik   melbourne-mel   st-louis-stl
  brazil-saopaulo   grand-rapids-grr   mexico-city-mex   sydney-syd
  brisbane-bne   great-falls-gtf   miami-mia   syracuse-syr
  bristol-brs   greensboro-gso   milwaukee-mke   taipei-tpe
  britain-london   greenville-gsp   minneapolis-msp   taiwan-taipei
  buffalo-buf   gulfport-biloxi-gpt   montreal-yul   tallahassee-tlh
  burbank-bur   harrisburg-mdt   nanjing-nkg   thailand-bangkok
  cairns-cns   hartford-bradley-bdl   amsterdam-ams   toledo-tol
  calgary-yyc   hong-kong-clk   newark-ewr   toronto-yyz
  canada-toronto   houston-iah   new-orleans-msy   townsville-tsv
  cedar-rapids-cid   huntsville-hsv   norway-oslo-osl   traverse-city-tvc
  charleston-chs   india-newdelhi   oakland-oak   tucson-tus
  charlotte-clt   indianapolis-ind   oklahoma-city-okc   vancouver-yvr
  chicago-midway-mdw   indonesia-jakarta   omaha-oma   victoria-yyj
  chicago-ohare-ord   ireland-dublin   ontario-ont   warsaw-poland-waw
  chile-santiago   islip-isp   orange-county-sna   westchester-county-hpn
  china-bejing   italy-rome   orlando-mco   wilkes-barre-avp
  cincinnati-cvg   jackson-jan   ottawa-yow   winnipeg-ywg
  cleveland-cle   jacksonville-jax   pensacola-pns   airport
  colorado-springs-cos   japan-tokyo   peoria-pia Moscow Sheremetyevo (SVO)
Moscow Domodedevo (DME) Moscow Vnukovo (VKO) St Petersburg (LED) Novosibirsk (OVB)